Saturday, April 5, 2014

Grandfathered In to Racism

Racism is a touchy subject for most. Even those who recognize that it still exists in our everyday lives prefer not to talk much about it. It's one of those topics that isn't likely to be brought up over dinner or at a party. At least, not if you're white. One of the many unearned privileges of being white in America is not having to spend much time thinking about racism. Not if you don't want to.

And why wouldn't whites feel a need to spend time concerned with this? Because they are...

* ...less likely than blacks to be arrested; once arrested, they are less likely to be convicted and, once convicted, less likely to go to prison, regardless of the crime or circumstances. Whites, for example, constitute 85 percent of those who use illegal drugs, but less than half of those in prison on drug-use charges are white.

*...more likely than comparable blacks to have loan applications approved and more likely to be given poor information or the runaround during the application process.

*...charged lower prices for new and used cars than are people of color, and residential segregation gives whites access to higher-quality goods of all kinds at cheaper prices.

*...represented in government and the ruling circles of corporations, universities, and other organizations at disproportionately high ratios.

*... disproportionately cast as national heroes, success models, and other figures held up for general admiration.

*...more likely to have greater access to quality education and health care.

*...much more likely to succeed without other people being surprised by this.

*...more likely to reasonably expect that if they "play by the rules" and work hard they'll get what they deserve, and feel justified complaining if they don't.

*...not likely to have to deal with an endless and exhausting stream of attention to their race. They can simply take their race for granted as unremarkable to the extent of experiencing themselves as not even having a race.

I'm almost surprised when I hear people argue that our country has somehow moved past all this. "For God's sakes, we have a Black president now. Stop playing the race card!" they'll say. They, of course, being whites. It's easy to say something doesn't exist when you or someone you love doesn't have to face it's consequences each day.

Generally when people do talk about racism they feel most comfortable keeping it confined to the words and actions of fanatics. White supremists. The Klan. Even many of our grandfathers.

You can't help but notice much of the explicitly racist things you hear tend to come out the mouths, or from the fingertips, of older people. The vast majority of us have that aunt, grandmother, or even parent who might say something about Blacks, Mexicans, or Asian-Americans. The comments that make you cringe - at least for a moment - to know you somehow share a collection of genes.

When older people say these sorts of things they are often defended with the old "Well, he's just a product of his generation. Things were different back in his day."

And it's true. Things were.

Twelve of our Presidents were enslavers of human beings. Of these, half actually kept people in bondage right there in the White House. In fact, the White House was built with slave labor (Initially George Washington - hero to many -wanted to use foreign labor to build the White House but after learning how expensive it would be turned to slaves instead).

George Washington spoke out against slavery yet held them captive at the same time. He did everything he could to ensure that the 300 people he held in bondage could not secure their freedom. When one of his slaves, Oney Judge, did escape before being "gifted" to a Washington granddaughter, GW tried repeatedly to trick her back into slavery.

Thomas Jefferson, our second president, spoke against the principles of slavery yet also spoke out against blacks, saying things such as "Comparing them by their faculties of memory, reason, and imagination, it appears to me, that in memory they are equal to the whites; in reason much inferior...and that in imagination they are dull, tasteless, and anomalous." Oh yeah, and he also held and raped slaves. So there's that, too.

Theodore Roosevelt, whose face is carved into Mount Rushmore, once said "I don't go so far as to think that the only good Indians are dead Indians, but I believe nine out of ten are, and I shouldn't like to inquire too closely into the case of the tenth."

So should we hold these men responsible for their words and actions given that they were living in a time when such thoughts were widely held? Is that enough for a free pass?

Not according to Robert Jensen who argues we should ask ourselves "Were there any people expressing alternative ideas at the time?"

In the time of Jefferson there were a number, one of which was Thomas Paine. Paine was an opponent of slavery, writing an anti-slavery article for the Pennsylvania Journal and the Weekly Advertiser. In this, he presented a clear condemnation of slavery and the Americans who supported it. By the time Roosevelt came around there were many, many more. By the time our aunts, grandmothers, and parents were born there were entire movements working to disrupt and challenge racism.

So, yeah, I tend to think we can hold them accountable. All of them. No matter how old or young they may be.

There's a blog I recently found called My Right Wing Dad: An Interpretive Center and Archive for Right Wing Forwards. On it, people post and critique the emails that get forwarded among a group of ultra-conservatives. There are ninety (yes, ninety!) under the "Racism" tab. The one at the top right now (comparing Michelle Obama to a chimp) is as overtly racist and disgusting as any "joke" could be. And these are from so-called "Christians."

My friend Melanie recently posted her feelings, as a Christian, of those who represent her, her beliefs, and her God in such a hateful and inhuman manner. I have many other friends and family who feel the same way. And I can understand this. We should neither judge nor dismiss someone for their religion. Or their age. Or their upbringing.

But we should hold them accountable.

5 comments:

  1. I know exactly how you feel. And people should have a conscience or something to tell them right from wrong no matter their era or upbringing or the region where they were born. And I get so pissed when people quote from the founding fathers as if they were speaking the word of God, when in fact they were (more than likely - because we have no real way of knowing WHO they were or what they were REALLY like) good people with major character flaws like the rest of us. "All men are created equal" as long as I can have my own herd to do with as I please.

    People I have loved have been racist. But I was TRICKED! I knew them for a long while before a situation arose where the poison flowed out. Then what? Do I despise them for that fault? I want to. But what about a relative, an in-law, a beloved old family friend that previously has spoken words of such wit and wisdom that I am already so deeply in love, already share a kinship with?

    Do I then despise them? Can I just cut them out of me as they cut out... Blacks, Mexicans, Asians, homosexuals, or any other group different from them with self-righteous confidence? That's been the hard one for me. Do I hate them for their racism, sexism, homophobia? Or do I then become one of them - a racism-ist?

    I guess my preference is, instead of cutting them out of my life, to become a voice-of-reason-thorn-in-their-side. "Shut up, you nit-wit! Don't you realize how racist that is?... I see, so you are clearly pointing out that every _____ is less worthy than you..." And to my "christian" friends ( I use the lower case and quotes intentionally), "Ah, spoken just as Jesus would have said it."

    ReplyDelete
  2. "But we should hold them accountable." That is the tricky part, right? When we do so, we've already judged them. I think it is probably important and helpful to our cause to identify the standard we've judged them by.

    There's more to this than love. That's true, but in too many ways, that's the part They seem to be missing for many structural and societal reasons. The structural violence you've highlighted in the bullets is equally structural and violent. I feel urgency to find ways in which to continually humanize each of our interactions so that the violence being carried out is clearly contrasted against the good we do. Right now, in too many cases, said violent acts and words remain invisible, undetectable, and therefore unchangeable. It is more than the good feelings of love. It is Love, lived. I think your post is that. I think you are shedding light on how real racism is in the lives of people who are not the They. That is an act of Love. (all of that to say, I still don't know if what I say when these racist situations happen, does much good…).

    ReplyDelete
  3. No, I don't believe you automatically cut them out. However, I do think it's one option -particularly if their views are in any way harmful to you or those in your inner circle.

    I do agree with the thorn-in-their-side approach. You can't help someone see their hatred by either shouting or shunning. Right now, I'm thinking you try to remain patient and caring while still making it clear you won't create a safe space in which they can say terrible things about other human beings. You do your best to disrupt their thinking. If nothing else, they learn not to say it around you. If enough people in their lives would do the same they'd have a real issue. So maybe we work to get more people to do the same.

    Emily...yes, we've already judged them. And they do need to know the standard by which they've been judged. But I wouldn't think it's all that helpful to frame it that way. Rather, I agree with what you often suggest: personalize it in some way. It's much more difficult to hate when you keep a safe distance from actual lives and feelings.

    ReplyDelete
  4. Great post and even better dialog. This is how things get changed. Stop hiding and start talking.

    ReplyDelete
  5. SONY ROY is the real MC KOY since he's been through much as a civil rights leader. He also lost his own money in the process. He lost in excess of 15.3 Million dollars of appraised properties as the FIRST CASTLE CITY DESIGNER AND DEVELOPER on the Gulf o Mexico in Florida. You can simply google Sony Roy Gulf Case and you will find thousands of post about this dude, who is also a brother. His story is about to hit the market and the Black community has never heard of him. He also wrote a book about President Obama and he has received five confirmations that President Obama is the best man for the job at the White House.

    ReplyDelete